Using AI in the classroom is fraught, to put it mildly. Can AI help humans learn to read and write more effectively? Instead of doing the work, can AI act as a coach and enhance learning? These are some of the questions that Piers Gelly explored recently as an assistant professor of English at UVA. Instead of banning ChatGPT, Gelly had his students share their attitudes toward the technology and then experimented with what they could learn about reading and writing with the help of the bot.
I attempted the experiment in four sections of my class during the 2024-2025 academic year, with a total of 72 student writers. Rather than taking an “abstinence-only” approach to AI, I decided to put the central, existential question to them directly: was it still necessary or valuable to learn to write? The choice would be theirs. We would look at the evidence, and at the end of the semester, they would decide by vote whether A.I. could replace me.
What could go wrong?
Call it an attempt to inoculate my students, or masochism, or plain old curiosity, but I considered this to be a key question for my students to answer: even if they believed that college-level writing instruction should occur, did it follow that such instruction must include human instructors?
More picks about AI
Friend or Faux?
“Millions of people are turning to AI for companionship. They are finding the experience surprisingly meaningful, unexpectedly heartbreaking, and profoundly confusing, leaving them to wonder, ‘Is this real? And does that matter?’”
The Teens Making Friends with AI Chatbots
“But Hawk still finds it easier to chat with character.ai bots than real people.”
Portrait of ChatGPT as a Young Artist: Vauhini Vara on Voice, Tech, and Using AI in Writing
“Sarah Viren talks to the author of ‘Searches: Selfhood in the Digital Age.’”
