These are dark days for hope.
From an ongoing, ever-mutating global pandemic to international conflict and the threat of nuclear war, to an impeccably researched, 3,600-page report outlining in excruciating detail the devastating consequences of climate change, there is no shortage of reasons to dread the future. Every morning, my phone pings me with an unending stream of thoughtful, articulate articles explaining exactly why I should be even more worried than I already am.
As much as I know I should look away, part of me views that barrage of bad news as the cost of being an informed participant in society. Hope can feel like a guilty pleasure, the sugar on the cereal of serious thought, best enjoyed in moderation if at all. Starting the day with a dose of doom is just what adults do.
Instead of hope, our culture keeps delivering new ways to throw its hands up in defeat. Prestige TV is drowning in dystopias, showing us how our darkest impulses and noblest aspirations will all turn out for the worst. Meanwhile, collective dreams of saving the Earth have largely made way for individualist fantasies of replacing it, with the worldโs richest men putting billions into immersive simulations and interplanetary escape hatches. The assumption seems to be that this worldโs already a lost cause, so we might as well replace it.
Lately, though, Iโve been trying my best to shake that mindset. If weโre going to face up to the seemingly insurmountable tasks ahead, hope isnโt a luxury; itโs a necessity. The challenge is approaching hope in a way that feels realistic. Easy answers can be as dangerous as pure defeatism, but if weโre going to convince ourselves to change, we need better futures to aspire to โ not just worse ones to avoid.
Iโve always had difficulty imagining a better world. In high school, tasked with a group project to design the political, economic, and cultural realities of a future paradise, our four-person team split into two irreconcilable factions, with my partner and I arguing that a true Utopia was simply impossible. We suggested instead a Matrix-style virtual world we called Inscience (from the Latin for โlack of knowledgeโ), where everyone would at least have the illusion of happiness. It was a cop-out, in the same way that escaping to a colony on Mars is a cop-out. We werenโt engaging with the actual assignment, because the task was simply too big.
Fortunately, there are others who are more up to the job than our teen selves were. Science fiction authors who challenge themselves to move beyond cynicism to more hopeful and genuinely disruptive futures. Ecologists who grapple with the complexity of Earthโs ecosystems, and search for new ways to embrace that complexity rather than control it. Writers, thinkers, and activists who donโt turn away from the peril they see surrounding us, but who also refuse to let that be all they see.
The late Thรญch Nhแบฅt Hแบกnh described compassion as a North Star, writing in 1987โs Being Peace that โIf I lose my direction, I have to look for the North Star, and I go to the north. That does not mean I expect to arrive at the North Star. I just want to go in that direction.โ Imagining a better future seems to work the same way: It isnโt about escaping from reality, itโs about finding your way when youโre feeling lost.
The inspiration for a better future can come from countless sources, and as the pieces below will attest, whether our North Star is fixed in a firmament of scientific fact or utopian fiction isnโt whatโs important. After all, following it doesnโt give us license to ignore the terrain weโre walking on. Thereโs still the risk that weโll stumble and fall โ but at least we can point ourselves in the right direction.
The Future Will Have to Wait (Michael Chabon, Details Magazine, January 2006)
One of the grandest gestures toward imagining the future is the Clock of the Long Now. Originally conceived by inventor, computer scientist, and Disney Imagineering fellow Danny Hillis, and expected to cost in the tens of millions of dollars, the clock is designed to keep time for 10,000 years. Besides being a tremendous feat of engineering, itโs also a tremendous statement of faith โ building it is a bet that there will be humans around over the next 10 millennia to hear its bells ring.
Plenty of articles have talked about the Clock (one of the earliest I could find was a tangent in a 1997 New Yorker piece on the futurist visions of Imagineers), but none of them grappled with its significance quite like โThe Future Will Have to Wait.โ As much as it describes the Clock, itโs more about the ultimate goal of the Long Now Foundation to encourage humanity to think on longer time scales, and the powerful emotions that can emerge just from imagining our survival into the far future:
The point of the Clock of the Long Now is not to measure out the passage, into their unknown future, of the race of creatures that built it. The point of the Clock is to revive and restore the whole idea of the Future, to get us thinking about the Future again, to the degree if not in quite the way same way that we used to do, and to reintroduce the notion that we donโt just bequeath the futureโthough we do, whether we think about it or not. We also, in the very broadest sense of the first person plural pronoun, inherit it.
As much as Chabonโs thoughts on the Clock resonated with my own, his description of his 8-year-old sonโs reaction is what gives the piece its heart. Itโs a reminder that the stories we tell genuinely can change how we see the world.
The Dangers of Cynical Sci-Fi Disaster Stories (Cory Doctorow, Slate, October 2020)
If narratives really are powerful enough to shape our future โ and thereโs plenty of research saying that they are โ then we should probably be careful about the stories we put out into the world. Not that there isnโt a place for stories about our darker side, but when every story focuses on the idea that weโre one disaster away from the collapse of civilization, it doesnโt give much to aspire to.
Science fiction author and activist Cory Doctorow describes that realization in this 2020 essay, written as part of Slateโs โFuture Tenseโ series on emerging technology, public policy, and society. Reflecting on the role of stories in shaping our mindset, he brings up philosopher Daniel Dennettโs idea of โintuition pumps,โ thought experiments designed to help intuit the answers to complex problems. Science fiction that imagines humanity as a competitive creature hiding beneath a veneer of cooperation doesnโt just contradict contemporary research into humanityโs origins โ it primes our pumps with exactly the wrong intuitions.
The problem is, itโs wrong. It makes for good stories, but those stories donโt reflect the truth of the world as I see it. Humanity is, on balance, good. We have done remarkable things. The fact that we remain here today, after so many disasters in our speciesโ history, is a reminder that we are a species of self-rescuing princessesโcharacters who save one another in crisis, rather than turning on ourselves.
Doctorow goes on to describe how that insight has influenced his writing and itโs fascinating to see an author confront the cynicism of their past work. His newer stories are still far from Utopian, but by putting the potential for change at their heart, theyโre more likely to inspire progress in the real world.
Is Becky Chambers the Ultimate Hope for Science Fiction? (Jason Kehe, Wired, September 2021)
In early 2022, Wired released a collection called โThe Future of Futuresโ that could easily have been a whole reading list in itself. Tempting as it was to include that seriesโ article on Tropical Futurism and alternative visions of tomorrow, it was edged out by another Wired article from a few months earlier: Jason Keheโs profile of science fiction author Becky Chambers.
To describe the unique mood of Chambersโ brand of science fiction, Kehe keeps returning to the metaphor of a pot of tea. Unlike the epic space operas that many people associate with sci-fi, her stories are calming, complex, โthe drink of choice for the clear-headed among us.โ Her writing falls into a genre called โhopepunk,โ one of a bouquet of alternatives to the dourness of cyberpunk that have begun blooming in the underground sci-fi landscape.
For Chambers, who didnโt ask to be labeled hopepunk but likes the term โvery much,โ the simple act of being kind in her writing, of imagining futures in which decency triumphs and people are allowed to cry tears of joy, qualifies as more than sufficiently rebellious in the 21st century. โYouโre looking at the world exactly as it is, with all of its grimness and all of its tragedy, and you say, No, I believe this can be better,โ she says. โThat to me is punk as hell.โ
Although Chambersโ stories arenโt speculative in the same sense as writers like Doctorow or Kim Stanley Robinson (probably the most prominent name in contemporary utopianism), that doesnโt detract from their aspirational power. Tea leaves may not be the most scientifically sound way to look at the future, but that doesnโt stop them from firing some imaginations.
Another Green World (Jessica Camille Aguirre, Harperโs Magazine, February 2022)
Coincidentally taking its title from an album by Long Now Foundation co-founder (and music icon) Brian Eno, Jessica Camille Aguirreโs profile of amateur scientist Kai Staats lives right on the border between science fiction and science fact. Staatsโ goal is real enough โ the self-contained biome heโs designing is a descendent of the Biosphere 2 project and a hopeful predecessor to a colony on Mars โ but whether a system as complex and chaotic as our ecosystem can really be condensed into a single space capsule is still an open question.
Like Chabonโs piece on the โClock of the Long Now,โ though, Aguirre isnโt just writing about a single project. Itโs about the challenges of space exploration, but itโs also about what the desire for exploration says about us as a species, and why some people feel such a visceral compulsion to leave the planet and found a new home for humanity. And even if that proves impossible, itโs also about how the projectโs complexity helps create a new appreciation for Earth, and just how miraculous the original Biosphere really is.
I thought about a conversation I had months before with Francesc Godia Casablancas, a chemical engineer who runs the ESAโs pilot plant in Barcelona, one of the most complex biological life-support systems ever developed. He told me that no matter what, his systems would always lose efficiency over time; the simplified biological cycle built by scientists in a series of reactors would never be โa perfect world.โ Living on a planet that still harbors secrets seemed to me like the opposite of being alone. There is a strange kind of companionship in the tension of not knowing, in the fact that the systems supporting life on Earth operate beyond our control.
The Landfill of the Future (Andrea McGuire, Hakai Magazine, March 2022)
Next to the big, bold future of interplanetary travel, a more efficient landfill may seem like an excessively modest goal. But pound for pound, the ground-level optimism that Andrea McGuire brings to her profile of Newfoundland-based startup 3F Waste Recovery is as restorative as anything youโll read this year. Connecting the companyโs circular economics equally to Canadian East Coast salvage culture and author Neal Stephensonโs futuristic technologies, she subtly makes the case that building a better world might be less reliant on new technologies than new mindsets.
Sci-fi often paints the future as an increasingly virtual dystopia. But a book like [Neal Stephensonโs] The Diamond Age pulses with inventive possibilities that could lead to more grounded, ecologically sound possibilities, too. For Wiper, the sparsely populated Northern Peninsula is the best place to nurture his utopic, sci-fiโinspired ideals. Here, he and his team are less shackled, less constrained than theyโd be in a denser, more centralized region, he says. Thereโs plenty of space for experimentingโwhich is an important consideration, since, as Lynch tells me, โexperimentation is absolutely crucialโ for the circular economy.
The idea of fusing future thinking and traditional knowledge is taken even further in Low-tech Magazineโs โObsolete Technologyโ series, which looks to seemingly outdated processes like using urban fish ponds for sewage processing, or the revolutionary potential of the hot water bottle. Itโs a circular spin on William Gibsonโs oft-quoted line about the futureโs uneven distribution: Sometimes the future is actually in the past.
Dystopias Now (Kim Stanley Robinson, Commune Magazine, November 2018)
Itโs nearly impossible to talk about better futures without bringing up Kim Stanley Robinson. Dubbed โthe gold-standard of realistic and highly literary, science-fiction writingโ by The Atlantic, the author of the iconic Mars trilogy has used his novels to explore topics from climate change and environmentalism to post-capitalist economics with a hard-won hopefulness, and it seems fitting to give him the last word.
Robinsonโs 2018 essay for Commune is ostensibly about dystopian writing, but as with Doctorowโs article above, itโs really a call to put our collective imagination to better use. We have the raw materials for a better future โ a planet that is more than capable of sustaining us, a sun that provides ample energy, and the ability to think creatively about how to build a sustainable civilization. Worrying can only take us so far, especially in our imagined worlds. Itโs time to do the work of hope.
Or maybe we should just give up entirely on optimism or pessimismโwe have to do this work no matter how we feel about it. So by force of will or the sheer default of emergency we make ourselves have utopian thoughts and ideas. This is the necessary next step following the dystopian moment, without which dystopia is stuck at a level of political quietism that can make it just another tool of control and of things-as-they-are. The situation is bad, yes, okay, enough of that; we know that already. Dystopia has done its job, itโs old news now, perhaps itโs self-indulgence to stay stuck in that place any more. Next thought: utopia. Realistic or not, and perhaps especially if not.
***
Peter Hemminger (@peterhemminger on Twitter) is a writer, cultural worker, radio host, and arts advocate based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Among other projects, he publishes the newsletter Wander Lines, which has spun off into a similarly named blog about music, philosophy, arts, and culture.
Get the Longreads Top 5 Email
Kickstart your weekend by getting the weekโs best reads, hand-picked and introduced by Longreads editors, delivered to your inbox every Friday morning.
