In this piece for SFGATE, Lester Black and Stephen Council investigate how, over 18 months, 18-year-old Sam Nelson used ChatGPT to explore “how to take drugs, recover from them and plan further binges.” According to OpenAI’s own protocols, this shouldn’t have been possible. But it was—with tragic consequences. The article lays out just how easy it can be “to elicit problematic or dangerous information from the bot.”
Models like ChatGPT, which are known as “foundational” models, are very different. They try to answer almost any question sent their way, based on training data that could be untrustworthy. OpenAI has never provided full transparency on what information trained its flagship product, but there’s evidence that the company fed ChatGPT massive chunks of the internet, including a million hours of YouTube videos and years of Reddit threads. That means a random Reddit user’s post could inform ChatGPT’s next response.
“There is zero chance, zero chance, that the foundational models can ever be safe on this stuff,” Eleveld said. “I’m not talking about a 0.1% chance. I’m telling you it’s zero percent. Because what they sucked in there is everything on the internet. And everything on the internet is all sorts of completely false crap.”
More picks on AI
Benchma(r)king
“James Bridle experiments with combining their practical carpentry skills and the abundant theoretical knowledge of AI to build a chair.”
Apocalypse Now and Then
“Artificial intelligence is capitalism’s final destination.”
Deskilling the Body
“We are, moment by moment, doing less sensing, navigating, remembering, walking, choosing, and attending.”
The People of Utah vs. Kevin O’Leary
“Mr. Wonderful wanted to build the world’s largest data center. The neighbors had other ideas.”
How AI Replaced Me
“An edtech worker’s account of what got left behind.”
Paid Phones
“Owing the payday loan apps.”
