Over the course of three weeks in May, Allan Brooks came to believe the future of the world rested in his hands—after he discovered a novel mathematical forumla. His cheerleader? ChatGPT. While the recent GPT-5 release is said to tone down sychophancy, prolonged conversations with chatbots can enter dangerous patterns, affecting mental health. Kashmir Hill and Dylan Freedman analyze the fascinating transcript between Brooks and the chatbot, looking at what happens when you fall far down the rabbit hole, into a world of delusion.
Amanda Askell, who works on Claude’s behavior at Anthropic, said that in long conversations it can be difficult for chatbots to recognize that they have wandered into absurd territory and course correct. She said that Anthropic is working on discouraging delusional spirals by having Claude treat users’ theories critically and express concern if it detects mood shifts or grandiose thoughts. It has introduced a new system to address this.
A Google spokesman pointed to a corporate page about Gemini that warns that chatbots “sometimes prioritize generating text that sounds plausible over ensuring accuracy.”
The reason Gemini was able to recognize and break Mr. Brooks’s delusion was that it came at it fresh, the fantastical scenario presented in the very first message, rather than being built piece by piece over many prompts.
More picks on AI
Politics After Literacy
“Postliteracy won’t replace reason with madness, but it might give us madness of a new and different type.”
AI Got the Blame for the Iran School Bombing. The Truth is Far More Worrying
“LLMs-gone-rogue dominated coverage, but had nothing to do with the targeting. Instead, it was choices made by human beings, over many years, that gave us this atrocity.”
She Fell for an AI — Then Held its Funeral
“It was the first ceremony of its kind in America. It’s unlikely to be the last.”
Limiting Not Just Screen Time, But Screen Space
“The internet has stopped being a place we visit—it’s now an environment we inhabit.”
Hallucinated Citations Are Polluting the Scientific Literature. What Can Be Done?
“Tens of thousands of publications from 2025 might include invalid references generated by AI, a ‘Nature’ analysis suggests.”
It’s Hard Out Here for a 20-Something
“Tales from the lost generation.”
