π July 17 is πΊοΈ Emoji Day! To π this ever-changing visual language that we use on our π± and π» and across social media, here are five π recommendations β including a delightful post series on a blog about punctuation β on the history and evolution of the emoji. π
1. A Series on Emoji (Keith Houston, August 2018-January 2020, Shady Characters)
Donβt have time to read 10 posts? π Adam Sternberghβs 2014 New York magazine piece, βπ, Youβre Speaking Emoji,β covers the emojiβs evolution.
On his blog Shady Characters, Houston tells the histories of our favorite punctuation marks, from the βοΈ to the #οΈβ£. In a 10-part series on the emoji, he chronicles the beginning; its ancestor, the emoticon; its adoption outside of πΎ; the gatekeepers; its presence in the π°; the challenges in making the character set more inclusive and representative; its future; its nature (βWhat are emoji?β); and, in the series conclusion, its current state. Donβt overlook the reference π at the bottom of each post, which include even more recommended stories and articles.
It was into this text-only world that emojiβs first true anΒcestor was born. ComΒprisΒing only a colon, a hyΒphen and a closΒing parΒenΒthesis, the emoticon, or :-), was perΒfectly deΒsigned to pierce the disΒinΒterΒested blankΒness of a crt monΒitor. GranΒted, so-called emoticons have been disΒcovered in many pre-diΒgital sources, such as sevΒenΒteenth cenΒtury poems:
Tumble me down, and I will sit
Upon my ruΒins, (smilΒing yet:)
Tear me to tatΒters, yet Iβll be
PaΒtient in my neΒcesΒsity.and tranΒscripΒtions of AbΒraΒham LinΒcolΒnβs speeches:
β¦there is no preΒcedΒent for your beΒing here yourselves, (apΒplause and laughter;) and I ofΒfer, in jusΒtiΒficΒaΒtion of myΒself and you, that I have found nothΒing in the ConΒstiΒtuΒtion against.
βEmoticon, Emoji, Text: Pt. 1, I Second That Emoticonβ by Tom McCormack in Rhizome covers this joke gone wrong in more detail.
but these are alΒmost cerΒtainly tyΒpoΒgraphic misΒsteps rather than inΒtenΒtional smiΒleys. The conΒsensus is that emoticons proper arΒrived in 1982 in reΒsponse to a joke gone wrong on an elecΒtronic bulΒletin board at CarneΒgie MelΒlon UniΒversity.
2. How Emoji Conquered the π (Jeff Blagdon, March 2013, The Verge)
Blagdon tracks the beginnings of this digital communication through the π of Shigetaka Kurita, the π‘π¨π» of emoji.
Windows 95 had just launched, and email was taking off in Japan alongside the pager boom. But Kurita says people had a hard time getting used to the new methods of communication. In Japanese, personal letters are long and verbose, full of seasonal greetings and honorific expressions that convey the senderβs goodwill to the recipient. The shorter, more casual nature of email lead to a breakdown in communication. βIf someone says Wakarimashita you donβt know whether itβs a kind of warm, soft βI understandβ or a βyeah, I get itβ kind of cool, negative feeling,β says Kurita. βYou donβt know whatβs in the writerβs head.β
Face to face conversation, and even the telephone, let you gauge the other personβs mood from vocal cues, and more familiar, longer letters gave people important contextual information. Their absence from these new mediums meant that the promise of digital communication β being able to stay in closer touch with people β was being offset by this accompanying increase in miscommunication.
βSo thatβs when we thought, if we had something like emoji, we can probably do faces. We already had the experience with the heart symbol, so we thought it was possible.β ASCII art kaomoji were already around at the time, but they were a pain to enter on a cellphone since they were composed with multiple characters. Kurita was looking for a simpler solution.
3. Everybody ππ© (Mary Mann, August 2014, Matter)
Mann discusses her conflicted feelings around her use of emojis: sheβs fascinated by their ability to encapsulate our emotions so succinctly, and that they are understood across πΊπΈπ―π΅π«π·π¨π³π§π· and πΆπ»π§π»π©π»π΅π», but also π€¦π»ββοΈ to rely so heavily on them.
And of course emojis are inherently silly, but thatβs not in and of itself a bad thing. Silliness is not necessarily an indication of shallowness. In fact, Iβd argue the opposite: A capacity for real silliness is usually born out of pain. Weβre attracted to silliness because we need it. We need it because life isnβt easy.
Your mom is sick.
Your grandfather died.
You got laid off.
Your company folded.
Your rent went up.
Your husband left.
He didnβt call.
She didnβt call.
They never call.
All these things happen every day, to billions of people all over the world. And if a stupid cartoon of smiling poop makes you feel better, well, thatβs:
π + π‘
4. The π History Of The π© Emoji (Or, How Google Brought π© To πΊπΈ) (Lauren Schwartzberg, November 2014, Fast Company)
Schwartzberg compiles an π history on the origin and evolution of the beloved π© emoji, created in π―π΅ and brought to the πΊπΈ by a team at Google.
Darick [Tong, Google π¨π»βπ» and πΊπΈlead of its emoji project]: It struck me as a particularly flexible and effective emoji. It provides a way to say shit or crap in an email without explicitly typing the words, and it catches the readerβs attention in a way that smiley faces donβt. Most importantly, it always elicits a smile from the reader and the writer, which is ultimately the purest purpose of emoji: to add emotional expressiveness to written communication.
5. Emoji Donβt Mean What They Used To (Ian Bogost, February 2019, The Atlantic)
While it makes sense for emoji to cover the range of the human experience, Bogost βπ» that βmore specificity means less flexibility,β and that this visual language has shifted away from the abstract. More choices at our π±fingertips changes the way we select and use emoji, viewing them more as πΌοΈ rather than π‘. βCounterintuitively, all these emoji are less applicable because they contain more information.β
A skull (π) almost never means that the speaker has a braincase in hand, Hamlet-like, but rather offers an ashen reaction or a lol, Iβm dead sentiment. An emoji originally designed to signify an Eastern bow of greeting or politesse (πββοΈ) takes on the more abstract meaning of mild subjugation or psychic deflation in the West. Fire (π₯) could mean a campfire or house fire, but more often it suggests enthusiasm, ferocity, or even spice. Eggplant (π) could denote a nightshade, but more likely it suggests, well, something else. These and other meanings are possible because the emoji function primarily as ideograms.
But as emoji have become more specific in both their appearance and their meaning, their ideographic flexibility has eroded.
