Is the app that ate email eating into a whole lot moreālike privacy, productivity, and personal time? In The Baffler, Jacob Silverman explores the darker side of Slack, the app that became so ubiquitous so fast, that thereās already a literature of Slack-detoxāwhich puts the burden of mitigating the appās downsides entirely on the user, and not on the app or the work culture in which itās used.
Itās worth noting that at some Slack-using companies, these mini detoxes are enthusiastically endorsed by the higher-ups. Alexis Madrigal, then editor in chief of Fusion, offered his advice to other bosses: āIf I could give one piece of advice to other media companies, itās that they should be cool with people deleting the app,ā he told Nieman Lab last year. āIf someoneās going on vacation or their anniversary, or if theyāre going to be away on a long weekend, we tell them to delete Slack from their phone because otherwise the temptation to check it is too great. Deleting the app really helps people disconnect, because itās that addictive as a social experience.ā
The boss is allowed to seem magnanimousāyouāre on vacation, delete the app!āas he encourages his employees to take steps to temporarily manage their addictions. Meanwhile, the onus of change falls back on each individual employee. The slacklash may be growing, but it is splintered into a thousand isolated quests, each featuring a lone worker facing off against the snarling beast of Information Overload. The recurring lament of the slacklash is, roughly, āI wish I could change, have more self-controlāāa refrain that could not be more different from, say, āAn injury to one is an injury to all.ā
