To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
In Praise of Public Pitching
Share this:
I’ve always been fascinated by how narrative journalism gets commissioned, reported, and published–but the most perplexing part of the entire system is the continued power imbalance between writers and publishers.
This imbalance persists in spite of the internet “democratizing” publishing. More digital publishers are embracing feature writing, but the process behind the scenes feels stuck in the past–a time-consuming marathon of unanswered emails and rejection.
Part of this seems to be based on traditional etiquette — that writers should only pitch stories to magazines one at a time, and that they should offer them exclusively. This creates the worst possible negotiating position for a writer: editors are in no rush to answer, and writers have no competing offers to consider.
The Risks of Going Public
It’s not just etiquette, though. Writers themselves are reticent to reveal, even semi-publicly, what stories they are working on, lest some other reporter try to swoop in and try to steal it.
But if they can avoid “giving their story away,” it seems like public story pitches–on Twitter, Facebook, or their blog–can help change the power balance between writers and publishers. And perhaps for some writers, editors can be forced to do some pitching of their own, to win the rights to publish a story.
Lately, I’ve seen more national magazine writers try this tactic, so I asked two of them, Jason Fagone and Ted Genoways, to share their own public pitching experiences.
‘Screw This. Maybe It’s Faster to Write a Note on Facebook’
Fagone, who’s written for GQ, Esquire, The Atlantic, and The New York Times, and is the author of the forthcoming book The Cryptologists, explains:
A Facebook Post to Editors
It’s too early to know the results (email him now if you’re interested), but Genoways says the risk of public pitching “cuts both ways.”
‘I Never Considered It Until I Saw Jason Do It’